Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 3017 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E3-1240 - 125 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 16 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
125
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.72/FPS
100%
Price, £
£215
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £215 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |