Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the more expensive Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 298 days older than the more expensive Core i5-10400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-10400 - 209 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - £215.0 vs £224.84
- Up to 6% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-10400 - £1.03 vs £1.1 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
209
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£215
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £215 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9707 minutes ago
Buy for £224.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9707 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |