Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 is 192 days older than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Performs up to 5% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-6100 - 61 vs 58 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 6 vs 4 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |