Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 757 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 16% better in Starfield than Xeon E3-1225 - 52 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 47 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 47 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |