Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2176M outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2176M is 653 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 127 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
121
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |