Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Xeon E-2176M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 757 days newer than Xeon E-2176M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Xeon E-2176M - 178 vs 174 FPS
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Xeon E-2176M
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
