Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3504 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 9% better in God of War than Pentium P6100 - 176 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 8 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium P6100
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
