Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 293 days newer than Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Sons Of The Forest than Pentium G4400 - 98 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 8 vs 2 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 13023 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
98
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12811 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |