Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Pentium B950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3238 days newer than Pentium B950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium B950
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Pentium B950 - 169 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium B950 - 8 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Pentium B950
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium B950 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
