Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Pentium B940 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2663 days newer than Pentium B940.
Advantages of Intel Pentium B940
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Pentium B940 - 529 vs 500 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium B940 - 24 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
529
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£599.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium B940 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |