Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Pentium 987 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1235 days newer than Pentium 987.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 987
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 17 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 14% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Pentium 987 - 167 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 987 - 8 vs 2 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
167
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 987 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |