Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Pentium 3825U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1887 days newer than Pentium 3825U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3825U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 43% better in Starfield than Pentium 3825U - 60 vs 42 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3825U - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium 3825U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3825U | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell-U | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
