Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Pentium 2020M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2223 days newer than Pentium 2020M.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 2020M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Pentium 2020M - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 2020M - 24 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
190
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£599.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 2020M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |