Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2012 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 4 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than Core M-5Y51 - 228 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 8 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core M-5Y51
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core M | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
