Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2332 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 4 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core M-5Y51 - 163 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £69.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core M | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |