Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9980HK outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9980HK is 2373 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9980HK
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than FX-6300 - 152 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9980HK | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |