Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1710 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-6300 - 235 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 64 vs 6 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | EPYC |
Vishera | Codename | Naples |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 32 |
6 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |