Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2584 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 5 than FX-6300 - 167 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
167
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£60
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Athlon |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |