Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 879 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-9900K - 142 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - £237.38 vs £419.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-9900K - £1.67 vs £3.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £419.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5769 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.67/FPS
100%
Price, £
£237.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £237.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5769 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |