Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 654 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-7500T - 181 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - £171.54 vs £419.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-9900K - £1.03 vs £2.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.32/FPS
44%
Price, £
£419.99
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for £419.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 524 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
167
92%
Value, £/FPS
£1.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£171.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £171.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |