Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - £158.28 vs £415.21
- Up to 54% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-12900F - £1.26 vs £2.71 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7500T - 153 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 24 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
126
82%
Value, £/FPS
£1.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£158.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £158.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
153
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.71/FPS
46%
Price, £
£415.21
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for £415.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |