Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1173 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Celeron G6900 - 181 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - £50.0 vs £419.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-9900K - £0.28 vs £2.32 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.32/FPS
12%
Price, £
£419.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £419.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Buy for £50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |