Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 20% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-10700F - 215 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £219.03 vs £489.99
- Up to 46% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-14900F - £1.22 vs £2.28 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
215
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.28/FPS
53%
Price, £
£489.99
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for £489.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4160 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
83%
Value, £/FPS
£1.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£219.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £219.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4357 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |