Buy on Amazon
£529.98
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $138
Availability
MSRP in USD: $138
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1793 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 26% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-8300 - 218 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £176.66 vs £529.98
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 62 vs 150 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i9-13900KS, 24 (8p+16e) Cores, 32 Threads, 32 MB Cache
Buy for £529.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-8300 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 3.7 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 91W, BX80684I38300
Buy for £176.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Single-Core
1301
41.90016103059581%
Multi-Core
3825
17.51935144048001%
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 150 W | TDP | 62 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
