Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 7700 - 166 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 7700 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £274.07 vs £533.99
- Up to 47% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900KS - £1.71 vs £3.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.22/FPS
53%
Price, £
£533.99
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for £533.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 600 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
160
96%
Value, £/FPS
£1.71/FPS
100%
Price, £
£274.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £274.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 600 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |