Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 58% better in War Thunder than Core i7-10700 - 301 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £231.7 vs £533.99
- Up to 31% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-13900KS - £1.22 vs £1.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
301
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.77/FPS
68%
Price, £
£533.99
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for £533.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
190
63%
Value, £/FPS
£1.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£231.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £231.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |