Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4110 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 14% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6100 - 168 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 95 vs 150 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £529.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 294 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |