Buy on Amazon
£35.24
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2929 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - £35.24 vs £564.99
- Up to 93% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i9-10900X - £0.24 vs £3.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 13% better in Saints Row than FX-6100 - 164 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 20 vs 6 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 CPU Used 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop Processor 3.3 GHz 8M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
CPU Intel Core i9-10900X 2066 Cascade BX
Buy for £564.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Zambezi | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 6 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
