Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2696 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-3470 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - £45.45 vs £570.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i9-10900X - £0.24 vs £3.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 77 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £570 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
189
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
100%
Price, £
£45.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £45.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |