Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4238 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - £32.99 vs £545.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-14900 - £0.28 vs £3.36 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 37% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3470 - 162 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 32 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
118
72%
Value, £/FPS
£0.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£32.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Buy for £545 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |