Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Core i3-8350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1917 days newer than Core i3-8350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-8350K - 136 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-8350K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £419.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1474
54.31098010316876%
Multi-Core
4238
25.800560087665897%
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |