Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 56 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 4% better in Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 211 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 91 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 24 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
203
96.2085308056872%
Value, £/FPS
£0.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60984 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8350K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |