Buy on Amazon
£389.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $599
Availability
MSRP in USD: $599
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 4251 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 38% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5620 - 205 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-12900K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.9/FPS
100%
Price, £
£389.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-12900K Desktop Processor 16 (8P+8E) Cores up to 5.2 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W
Buy for £389.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2943 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-12900K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5620 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Westmere-EP |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 80 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
