Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1547 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 26% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - £3.0 vs £3.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - £315.0 vs £389.99
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£389.99
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £389.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12578 minutes ago
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12579 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |