Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 4312 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E5620 - 183 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 24 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
