Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2986 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 37% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 205 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.9/FPS
100%
Price, £
£389.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £389.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |