Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2521 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 26% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 194 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.52/FPS
100%
Price, £
£295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58463 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
386
22.18390804597701%
Multi-Core
2325
25.560686015831134%
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |