Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 204 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - £59.75 vs £228.97
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £228.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75395 minutes ago
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75394 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
28.374021188392444%
Multi-Core
1051
11.460037073383491%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |