Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - £59.75 vs £221.93
- Up to 70% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i5-10600K - £0.13 vs £0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 9% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G4900 - 499 vs 456 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
456
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6045 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
499
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.44/FPS
29%
Price, £
£221.93
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for £221.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6046 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |