Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1500X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 1500X - 125 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1500X - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £220.0 vs £264.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900KF - £1.86 vs £2.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £264 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
118
94%
Value, £/FPS
£1.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£220
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1500X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |