Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 602 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Athlon 200GE - 210 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £86.0 vs £270.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-10900KF - £0.44 vs £1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18282 minutes ago
Buy for £86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |