Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1703 days newer than Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-6700T - 171 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
171
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.45/FPS
100%
Price, £
£248.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £248.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |