Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 608 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 236 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
236
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£251.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £251.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |