Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1498 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 113 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
113
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£482.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £482.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2823 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
67.81609195402298%
Multi-Core
5480
60.246262093227784%
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |