Buy on Amazon
£409.61
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2991 days newer than Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Core i7-950 - 185 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 24 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£409.61
100%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Processor - (12 Core/24 Threads) - YD192XA8AEWOF
Buy for £409.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Single-Core
463
39.43781942078364%
Multi-Core
1569
22.491399082568808%
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
