Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Core i7-930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 3416 days newer than Core i7-930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 42% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-930 - 326 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-930 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-930 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
326
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Feb 28th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |