Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i7-930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3552 days newer than Core i7-930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-930
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-930 - 178 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-930 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-930 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£60
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-930 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Feb 28th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
Bloomfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |