Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 912 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 45% better in League of Legends than Ryzen 5 3400G - 184 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - £67.0 vs £73.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen 5 3400G - £0.36 vs £0.58 per FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £73.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
184
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |