Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 3188 days newer than Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i7-920 - 114 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 24 vs 8 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
114
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£409.61
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for £409.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
415
35.34923339011925%
Multi-Core
1434
20.556192660550458%
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |