Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 11% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1610 - 130 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - £5.56 vs £271.36
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £271.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
32.22390317700454%
Multi-Core
739
15.753570667235131%
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |